So here goes.
First off, I agree with the basic premise of the op/ed--the idea that YA is trending darker and darker. I don't think it's a debatable point. You read things today in YA that you would not *ever* have dreamed of reading before. Explicit sex scenes of every flavor, violence, self-mutilation--you name it. I think a lot of people who don't follow the YA scene would be very surprised to know what's out there these days, and for that, I think Gurdon's article does a good job of bringing it to light.
As an op/ed piece, it certainly was effective. It's gotten people talking about the subject, and it's no doubt gotten her a lot of eyeballs. (Which would be cooler if they were literal eyeballs, considering the subject matter.) Of course, she did so by resorting to a gross overreaction and oversimplification of the genre--one which I think was unnecessary and may even prove to be harmful. Leading with this quote is perhaps the most misleading item of the article:
Hundreds of lurid and dramatic covers stood on the racks before her, and there was, she felt, "nothing, not a thing, that I could imagine giving my daughter. It was all vampires and suicide and self-mutilation, this dark, dark stuff." She left the store empty-handed.So there are hundreds of books available, but one mother felt like she couldn't find a single non-disturbing book. This was at a Barnes & Noble, mind you, so we can't assume she was at Gothic & Gruesome, Inc. No--this was one mother's experience and dismay with the current state of affairs of YA fiction. Gurdon goes on to name specifics and get nitty gritty about what exactly she means by "dark YA." And her examples prove her point. I don't think the internet would have exploded if she'd just been a tad less overarching. Starting with the quote from the mom seems to say that what Gurdon's point out applies to all YA these days.
And that just ain't true.
The thing is, Gurdon knows this. She's a regular children's/YA book reviewer for the Journal. In the sidebar to the article, she (or someone at the Journal) makes some recommendations for YA books that span the last 70 years). I just read her review for Mockingjay, and it seemed to me to be fair and a pretty good evaluation of the novel. What I mean to say is that Gurdon has more to her name than just this article. She knows the YA scene, and she knows she's simplifying it. It doesn't help her case at all that she doesn't take any space in her article to discuss how not EVERY YA book being published these days is full of gratuitous sex and violence.
In the end, YA fiction is just like adult fiction. There's something for everyone. Like I said, I agree with Gurdon that YA is trending darker and darker. I wouldn't recommend some books to all readers. Then again, my time working in a public library proved to me that some people will be offended by anything. Literally. Do I think it's the responsibility of authors and editors to not offend people? No. It's the responsibility of people to know what they're getting into, and to decide for themselves what to read or watch.
Last night, Denisa and I were watching a delightful French romantic comedy (I Do, which I give a very strong 3 stars to and heartily recommend, with the caveat that there's an extremely foul mouthed parrot and a scene of comic S&M--that doesn't show anything.) In any case, we started talking about censorship and art. When I was at BYU, an exhibit by Rodin came to the art museum. It included his The Kiss sculpture. BYU didn't allow it to be exhibited, which was fairly ridiculous in my opinion. If they didn't want to show some of his best work, they shouldn't have paid for the work to come to the university in the first place.
This is just to say that you clearly can't please everyone. Such is life. I don't fault Gurdon with writing a piece on what I see as an important topic to discuss in YA literature. I do fault her for portraying it as a one-sided, black and white issue. It's more complex than that. Simplifying it no doubt got her more readers, but it does a disservice to the genre, and she should know better.
That said, I also believe people should do a bit more research before they seek to mob someone online. Gurdon isn't as clueless as some of the comments wanted her to be.
Which makes what she wrote worse, of course, not better.